Judul | UIBA’s and Happy Pontist’s Kukar bridge collapse theory |
Edisi | |
ISBN/ISSN | |
Pengarang | Prof. Sohei Matsuno - Personal Name |
Subyek/Subjek | Content type | Karya Ilmiah Dosen |
Bahasa | English |
Penerbit | Universitas IBA |
Tahun Terbit | |
Abstrak | This is a comparative study of UIBA’s and Happy Pontist’s theories on the Kukar Bridge collapse. It’s a rehearsal with a sparring partner to prepare for a performance with an official study team of four-university coalition in Indonesia. For this purpose, The Happy Pontist, ‘KutaiKertanegara bridge collapse,’ happypontist.blogspot.com/, the UK, 1 February 2012, is chosen as a counterpart; since it covers the event in a wide range that enables the comparative study to have common agendas in discussions. There’re different concepts, ideas etc between the two theories, however, it’s rather preferable to execute the study. Would there be no difference, no comparison could be. This paper shows the differences, analyses them and derives conclusions, quoting other comments, if useful in discussions. This study judges that the major differences between the two are due to different definitions of the same terms. The writer’s are narrow and rigid vs. the counterpart’s are wide and flexible. This paper’s conclusions are derived from the writer’s norms. May the writer wait for a counter comparative study from different norms? |
Digital File | LOADING LIST... |
Kembali ke sebelumnya |